| Institutional
History
The
history of New Jersey's county loan offices is, in large part, the
history of the paper-money question in eighteenth-century America.
While the surviving mortgage books and ledgers of the loan offices
are used today primarily to research early land holdings, these
records also document an important aspect of the colonial and Revolutionary
War-era economy.
Early (Tax-Backed) Paper Money - In the
early days of the colony, coinage (or specie) was very
scarce. Taxes were typically paid in wheat or other produce. By
1704, due to the shortage of silver and gold, various foreign currencies
were in circulation with exchange values higher in the colonies
than in England. That year, Queen Anne proclaimed that foreign coins
should not be valued over one third their exchange rate in England.
Such currency (or proclamation money), nevertheless, continued
to be overvalued in the colonies because of the shortage of other
circulating media. In 1709, a British expedition against Canada
required the colonies to contribute quotas of men and money. With
the New Jersey treasury bare, the assembly chose to issue £3,000
in paper money (or bills of credit) to be retired through
collection of taxes within two years. A second expedition two years
later led to the issue of an additional £5,000. During the
years ensuing, retirement of the bills through collection of taxes
fell into arrears and the legislature then postponed the retirement
of £2,000 in outstanding expired bills. The value of the bills
during this time fell to an exchange rate of £165 New Jersey
pounds to £100 pounds sterling.
The devaluation of this early tax-backed paper money led to the
proposal by William Pinhorne, in 1716, that New Jersey issue paper
money backed by property mortgages. Private land banks had been
tried in the colonies in the late 1600s, and public land banks had
been established more recently in South Carolina (1712), Massachusetts
(1714) and Rhode Island (1715). Pinhorne proposed that no interest
be charged; instead, the mortgagors would pay back one twentieth
of the loan amount each year for a period of twenty years. The government
could place the principal collected into a fund for investment.
The proposal was dismissed at that time—possibly due to distrust
of Pinhorne, who had served in the unpopular Governor Cornbury's
council. Instead, the following year, the assembly chose to act
on a proposal by Representative Jeremiah Basse to again issue bills
of credit—this time totalling £400. The issue devalued
New Jersey money even more, bringing the exchange rate to £178
per £100 sterling. During the next few years, the government
made an effort to retire the colony's paper money, with Governor
Hunter (by advice of the British Board of Trade) also rejecting
a proposal for another issue of bills.
The eventual scarcity of specie again led to economic difficulties
for the less wealthy. As evidence of this, the colony's 1722 revenue
act permitted the payment of taxes in wheat at a price below the
market rate. When the New Jersey Assembly met in October 1723, not
surprisingly, petitions were presented from the colony's citizens
expressing the need for paper money. New Hampshire had legislated
a public land bank in 1717, as did Pennsylvania in March 1723. New
York had also put into circulation a batch of bills of credit. After
several weeks of deliberation, on 30 November 1723, the legislature
finally passed New Jersey's first loan-office act.
The 1724-36 Loan - The loan-office act of
1723 called for the printing of £40,000 of paper money in
denominations ranging from one shilling to three pounds (making
it widely available for small and ordinary purchases). The bills
were to bear the date 25 March 1724. Loan offices were to be set
up in each county and allotted a quota of the bills based on the
county's population. Loan office commissioners, appointed for each
county in the law, were authorized to issue the paper money through
twelve-year mortgages on unencumbered land of value at least double
the principal of the loan. Loans were to be made for no less than
£12-6 and no more than £100. The annual interest rate
was five percent—considerably lower than the private interest
rate set by the legislature in 1719 at a maximum of eight percent.
The borrower was required to pay back one twelfth of the principal
plus interest each year, with the first payment due 25 March 1725.
If a mortgagor failed to make a payment on time, it would be considered
a judgment against him. If payment was not made within a thirty-day
grace period following, the commissioners were empowered to foreclose.
The commissioners were also given the responsibility of cancelling
and burning the returned bills each year in the presence of the
justices and freeholders of their county.
The loan-office system established in 1723 seems to have been generally
popular—the middle class was better able to secure mortgages
and enjoy the use of paper money while, at the same time, the public
debt was paid off and the interest on the loan helped to defray
the costs of government. The wealthy also benefitted, many taking
out loan-office mortgages themselves. Furthermore, as a result of
the increased revenues of the government, the legislature voted
themselves duplicate pay and generous bonuses. Governor Burnet was
given a £1,000 gift, for incidentals, plus additional regular
salary appropriations. These benefits, however, were short-term.
Inflation (i.e., devaluation of the bills) was on its way, though
at a rate lower than in many other colonies; and it was not felt
fully for several years because New Jersey's money, which was accepted
in both Pennsylvania and New York, had a higher value than the bills
of either neighboring colony.
Following a flood of counterfeits in 1727, the legislature called
in the outstanding loan-office notes and issued new ones. By the
following year, however, paper money was again growing scarce and
the colony's treasuries were low. It became difficult to collect
taxes and, by 1730, the government had unpaid salary warrants from
as far back as 1726. As a result, the commissions of the loan-office
officials were reduced. Bills were introduced in the assembly to
relieve insolvent debtors and to lower the maximum legal interest
rate. The solution to the colony's economic problems appeared to
the legislature to be the introduction of more paper money by means
of another loan-office act.
The 1733-49 Loan - The second loan-office
act, calling for £20,000 in bills of credit, was passed by
the legislature on 8 July 1730. The system it provided for differed
from the 1723 system only in that the loans were to run for sixteen
years instead of twelve, and that principal paid back during the
first eight years could be borrowed again. The king's approval of
this law was required, however, and it was not given until 1732.
As a result, the loans were not made until the spring of 1733. Meanwhile,
the colony's economy had grown worse. Only £10,000 of the
original £40,000 in loan-office bills were left in circulation.
Legislation was once again introduced to lower the maximum legal
interest rate and to relieve imprisoned debtors. A petition from
Monmouth County requested that the paper money of New York and Pennsylvania
be accepted as legal tender in New Jersey. The legislature's solution,
ultimately, was to draft another loan-office act.
The 1737-53 Loan - The third loan-office
act, passed 16 August 1733, called for an issue of £40,000.
The system prescribed largely resembled that of the second loan-office
act except that the commissioners were to be elected, not appointed
(there having been complaints about the management of the loan offices).
Because of the inflationary tendencies of paper money, however,
the measure was strongly opposed by Councilor Lewis Morris (later
governor), who protested to the British Board of Trade. Despite
this, the king's approval was eventually given to the legislation.
Sixteen-year loans were issued beginning 25 March 1737. Although
the issue of loan-office money resulted in a reduced value of New
Jersey bills in New York, the colony did see a boom in land speculation.
And eventually, New Jersey's money again became valued higher than
that of its neighbors.
The Paper-Money Debate, 1740-53 - In 1740,
the British House of Commons, responding to merchant complaints
about depreciated colonial currency, passed a series of resolutions
directing all governors to veto paper-money acts unless they carried
a suspending clause requiring royal approval. At the same time,
Lewis Morris, whose views against paper money were already well
known, became governor of the province. During the next few years
a struggle ensued between the governor and the assembly. In 1742,
the legislature passed a £40,000 loan-office bill with a suspending
clause, with a second measure offering a £500 payment to Governor
Morris. The governor refused to sign it and dissolved the assembly.
In the next two years, the assembly refused to pass revenue acts
(which included the governor's salary) until a loan-office bill
was signed. Such bills, however, were rejected by the council—a
more conservative body appointed by the governor. Following several
years of deadlock, in 1746, Governor Morris tried to negotiate with
the assembly. He agreed to sign their loan-office bill, which had
been approved by the council, if they would grant him his customary
salary. They offered him half then and half when the bill was confirmed
in England, fearing that the governor would recommend the law's
disallowance by the king. Governor Morris maintained his position,
however, and prorogued the assembly. Two weeks later, Morris died,
still owed his last two years of salary.
Jonathan Belcher, formerly governor of Massachusetts, was appointed
to the New Jersey vacancy shortly after Morris's death. After being
dismissed for his opposition to the Massachusetts land bank, he
did not want to make the same mistake in New Jersey. He asked for
permission from the Board of Trade to sign a new loan-office act
as soon as it was presented. Robert Hunter Morris, son of the late
governor, chief justice of the province, and subsequently governor
of Pennsylvania, wrote the agent of the eastern proprietors in London
urging him to oppose such permission. Governor Belcher was told
by the Board of Trade, however, that if the suspending clause was
attached, the act would be considered on its own merits. The assembly's
loan-office bill called for £40,000; it also included a £500
gift to the governor. The act was sent to England with Governor
Belcher's recommendations for confirmation.
In 1749, Governor Belcher's loan-office act was disallowed by the
king. The same year, the second loan-office issue expired. Two years
later, Parliament passed the Currency Act of 1751, forbidding the
establishment of land banks and the issuance of legal-tender bills
of credit in New England. The British dislike of paper money in
the colonies appeared to be stronger than ever.
1753-1774 Period - With the expiration of the third
loan-office issue in 1753, the New Jersey Assembly presented a petition
to the king asking for approval of a loan-office act to issue £60,000
(despite the Currency Act of 1751). Before it could be learned whether
the British would approve the measure, however, the French and Indian
War began. While the assembly saw the English need for troops as
a means of leverage for an issue of paper money, the king's conditions
for approval ultimately amounted to a veto. During the next few
years the assembly attempted, unsuccessfully, to withhold appropriations
for colonial defence in order to force royal authorities to approve
a series of loan-office bills. In 1757, New Jersey was the only
colony not to vote its quota for support of the war effort.
After the fall of Fort William Henry in the summer of 1757, the
assembly feared that the French invasion might reach as far as New
Jersey. With an £89,000 paper-money petition not approved
by the king, the assembly resolved to issue £30,000 in bills
of credit to support the war, to be retired by taxes. Another issue
of £50,000 in bills was voted in March 1758. In both cases,
the assembly disobeyed a 1754 royal instruction by postponing retirement
of the bills beyond five years. The £89,000 paper-money proposal
was eventually disallowed.
More funds were needed every year to support the troops. During
the war years, New Jersey ultimately issued a total of £347,500
in paper money, of which at least £275,000 was still outstanding
in 1764. That year, Parliament passed another Currency Act which
prohibited any colonial assembly from issuing legal-tender bills
of credit or extending the maturity of any bills already issued.
New Jersey, however, already had the largest public debt of any
of the North American colonies.
The depression that followed the French and Indian War (with taxation
to reduce the public debt), along with the Stamp Act of 1765, resulted
in petitions to the assembly again complaining of the shortage of
money. In April 1768, the assembly passed another loan-office act.
Governor William Franklin refused to sign it, however, because it
made the notes legal tender and carried no suspending clause. Franklin
did, nevertheless, pass the act on to the British Secretary of State.
Word came back in 1769 that the bill had been disallowed by the
king. However, encouragement was given for the assembly to pass
another bill for issuing £100,000 in bills that would not
be legal tender. A new loan-office act was introduced that made
bills legal tender only for payment of debts due to the loan offices.
Word arrived in 1770 that the king's Privy Council had disallowed
the bill on the grounds that the notes were made legal tender at
the colonial treasury. The New Jersey Assembly was outraged, especially
considering that other colonies—including Pennsylvania, New
York and Maryland—had been allowed to issue paper money which
was legal tender at the issuing office. The result was that the
New Jersey Assembly adopted New York's earlier tactic to vote no
additional support for the king's troops.
The 1776-96 Loan - During the next few years,
complaints of scarcity of money were frequently heard through petitions
to the legislature requesting a loan-office act. When Parliament
amended the Currency Act of 1764 to allow bills of credit that were
legal tender at the treasury but not for private payments, Governor
Franklin recommended in March 1774 that the assembly do as Pennsylvania
had recently done—say nothing about legal tender and simply
assume that the bills would be accepted at the loan offices. The
assembly reluctantly took his advice and, on March 11th, passed
a new loan-office bill issuing £100,000. The act, however,
was required to include a suspending clause, and royal approbation
was not granted by the king until February 1775. Word of this did
not reach the New Jersey Assembly until May, when it was too late
to establish the loan offices that year (the act stipulating that
the loan-office commissioners were to collect payments on the 25th
of March). As a result, the mortgages were not issued in the respective
county loan offices until 25 March 1776.
The 1774 legislation, which remained in effect following independence
in 1776, allowed for twenty-year loans between £15 and £100
at an interest rate of five percent per annum. Collateral in the
form of land or tenements had to be valued at least twice the principal;
houses had to be valued at least three times the principal. Only
interest was required to be paid during the first ten years. From
the eleventh through the twentieth year, one tenth of the principal
had to be paid in addition to interest. The interest collected was
to be applied to supporting the government or to any other public
use subsequently directed. In June 1781, the loan-office act was
amended to allow the courts of quarter sessions in the respective
counties to appoint just one loan-office commissioner for each county.
The 1786-98 Loan - The close of the Revolutionary
War brought about a renewed demand for paper money. In 1784, with
the retirement of continental bills, only two dollars per capita
remained in circulation in the form of state bills of credit and
revenue money. Wartime spending had also resulted in the accumulation
of a large state debt which could not practicably be paid off without
the issuance of more paper money. The popular answer, again, was
to issue currency on loan. In the summer and fall of 1784, petitions
were presented to the legislature from half of the counties asking
for a loan-office bill. In October 1785, there was sufficient support
for the measure in the assembly to appoint a committee to draft
legislation. The resulting bill, however, was returned to committee
until the following sitting by Abraham Clark, leader of the paper-money
advocates. The delay tactic may have been used to build up popular
support for the bill in order to influence the council, a majority
of whose members were opposed to the plan.
During the next few months, a heated debate occurred in the press
and between the state's leading politicians. On the anti-paper-money
side were Governor William Livingston and future governor, William
Paterson. When the legislature gathered in February 1786, they received
an unprecedented number of petitions from their constituents for
and against the issue of paper money. With a total of at least 140
petitions, the popular votes were tallied by the council. Nearly
half of signatures collected were for a loan-office issue of legal-tender
bills. Only twenty-nine percent were opposed to an issue of paper
money of any kind. The legislature's mandate was clear. However,
after the bill passed the assembly it was defeated in council eight-to-five.
The assembly quickly repassed the bill, which was then defeated
seven-to-six in council. The legislature then adjourned. In May,
the bill was again passed by the assembly and this time passed the
council seven-to-six. New Jersey's last loan-office act became law
on 26 May 1786.
The law itself was patterned very closely after the colonial versions.
The loan issue totalled £100,000, with individual loans not
to exceed £100. Security was to be at least double the value
of the loan principal if land, or at least four times the principal
if houses or town lots. The term of the loan would be twelve years,
with the mortgagors not required to pay back principal for the first
seven. The loan offices were opened in December 1786 and the bills
were put into circulation. Unfortunately, the merchants of Philadelphia
and New York refused to accept payment in the new currency, preferring
bank notes issued by their own recently created commercial banks.
New Jersey's currency then depreciated rapidly in value, ceasing
to circulate after 1789 (though it continued to be used for payment
of taxes).
With the adoption of the federal constitution, which prohibited
the issuing of money by states, the loan-office system came to an
end. For three quarters of a century, however, it was a primary
means of putting paper money into circulation. From 1723 to 1786,
a total of £300,000 in bills of credit was issued in this
fashion by the New Jersey Legislature.
Gloucester County Loan Office - While the
early mortgage books and ledgers of the Gloucester County Loan Office
are not known to have survived, basic information about the activities
of the county's commissioners can be found in the loan-office legislation
and in the minutes of the Gloucester County Board of Chosen Freeholders.
In 1723, the sum of £3,080 was allotted to Gloucester County.
Samuel Coles, Esq., Thomas Spicer and Joseph Cooper Jr. were appointed
by law as the county's commissioners. In April 1727, Coles resigned
and was replaced by John Kay. In 1732, the second loan-office act
reappointed the incumbent commissioners in all of the counties.
Gloucester County's quota that year was £1,715.
A total of £3,430 was allotted to Gloucester County in 1735.
Under the revised legislation, loan-office commissioners were to
be elected by the justices and freeholders in each county (although
this was not done until 1737, following the king's approbation).
In Gloucester County, all three incumbents were elected: Spicer,
Cooper, and Kay. In 1740, John Kaighn was chosen to replace Kay,
then deceased. In 1749, Ebenezer Hopkins and Samuel Harrison Jr.
were chosen to replace Cooper and Kaighn, then deceased. Samuel
Harrison appears not to have been actively involved in the operations
of the loan office, however, since only Ebenezer Hopkins and Thomas
Spicer are named in the freeholders' minutes as commissioners for
the remaining years of the 1737 loan.
Gloucester County was allotted the sum of £7,632 by the 1774
loan-office act. The following year, John Gill, Joseph Hugg and
John Hinchman were elected the county's commissioners. On 25 March
1776, pursuant to the law, the commissioners opened the loan office
at nine o'clock in the morning. They quickly adjourned to the house
of William Hugg in Gloucester Town, however, "the weather being
too Severe to sit in the Court House." There the commissioners
took in applications for mortgages from 110 landowners amounting
to £9,120. A number of the applications were rejected because
of insufficient collateral or because the land offered was already
entailed. Since the amount collectively applied for still surpassed
the county's quota, and it was decided to allow mortgages at £90
per £100 applied for. A total of 102 mortgages were entered
into.
In May 1777, John Gruffyth was appointed as commissioner to replace
John Hinchman, who had "declined Transactting any part of the
Business" according to the commissioners' minutes. In 1782,
Joseph Hugg was appointed sole commissioner of the Gloucester County
Loan Office as a result of the loan-office act amendment passed
in June 1781. Four years later, the freeholders threatened to prosecute
Hugg when he refused to settle his accounts. In 1796, Joseph Hugg
died. His sons and executors, Joseph and George W. Hugg, were ultimately
compelled to pay the state $874.61 (the equivalent of £327-19-7)
in February 1800 to settle their father's loan-office account.
Gloucester County's quota for the 1786 loan was £7,953-6-8.
Samuel Hugg and Joseph Champion were chosen commissioners. The loan
office was opened at the house of William Hugg in Gloucester Town
on 21 December 1786. Over 200 applications were received, collectively
requesting more than twice the county's quota. As a result, the
commissioners set the loan proportion at £50 per £100
applied for, assuming that some of the applicants would withdraw.
A total of 185 mortgages were entered into, all dated 5 December
1786 (though the work of issuing the loans was not completed until
the second week of January, 1787). For the next twelve years, the
operations of the loan office appear to have proceeded with little
controversy, with the two original commissioners making regular
reports to the freeholders until the expiration of the loan issue
in 1798.
The service of the Gloucester County commissioners can be summarized
as follows:
| Commissioner |
Years
Served |
Comments |
| Samuel
Coles, Esq. |
1723-1727 |
Resigned |
| Thomas
Spicer |
1723-1753 |
Active
at the expiration of the 1737 loan |
| Joseph
Cooper Jr. |
1723-1749 |
Deceased |
| John
Kay |
1727-1740 |
Deceased |
| John
Kaighn |
1740-1749 |
Deceased |
| Ebenezer
Hopkins |
1749-1753 |
Active
at the expiration of the 1737 loan |
| Samuel
Harrison Jr. |
1749-1753? |
Apparently
inactive |
| John
Gill |
1775-1782 |
Superseded
by Joseph Hugg as sole commissioner |
| Joseph
Hugg |
1775-1796 |
Made
sole commissioner for the 1776 loan in 1782; died
1796 |
| John
Hinchman |
1775-1777 |
Resigned |
| John
Gruffyth |
1777-1782 |
Superseded
by Joseph Hugg as sole commissioner |
| Samuel
Hugg |
1786-1798 |
Active
at the expiration of the 1786 loan |
| Joseph
Champion |
1786-1798 |
Active
at the expiration of the 1786 loan |
Bibliography
Acts of the
General Assembly of the State of New-Jersey.
(Trenton, 1780). Chap. 41, page 85.
Acts of the Fifth General Assembly of the State
of New-Jersey. (Trenton, 1781). Chap. 35, pages 99-102.
Acts of the Tenth General Assembly of the State
of New-Jersey. (Trenton, 1786). Chap. 145, pages 293-313.
Acts of the Eleventh General Assembly of the
State of New-Jersey. (Trenton, 1786). Chap. 161, pages 338-340.
Bureau of Archives and History Manuscript Collection
(held by the State Archives).
Bush, Bernard. Laws of the Royal Colony of New
Jersey (New Jersey Archives, Third Series), Volumes
II-V.
(Trenton, 1977-1986).
Jensen, Merrill. The New Nation: A History of
the United States during the Confederation, 1781- 1789. (New
York, 1950).
Pages 313-26.
Kemmerer, Donald L. "A History of Paper Money
in Colonial New Jersey, 1668-1775." Proceedings of the
New Jersey
Historical Society, 74(2):107-144,
April 1956.
McCormick, Richard P. Experiment in Independence:
New Jersey in the Critical Period, 1781- 1789. (New Brunswick,
1950). Chap. VIII, "Money:
the Familiar Remedy," pages 186-217.
Minutes of the Gloucester County Board of Chosen Freeholders,
Books A & B. (Originals at the Gloucester County
Historical Society; available
on GSU microfilm reel #1004243/Archives reel GCHS #256).
Perkins, Edwin J. American Public Finance and
Financial Services, 1700-1815. (Columbus, OH, 1994).
Pages 29-55, 145-154.
Votes and Proceedings of the General Assembly
of the Colony of New-Jersey at a Sitting begun at Burlington,
Monday, May 15, 1775 ...
(Burlington, 1775). Pages 14 and 20-21.
Whitehead,
William A. Documents relating to the Colonial History of the
State of New Jersey, Volume IV.
(Newark, 1882). Pages 269-272.
Content Note
This
series includes the three record books of the Gloucester County
Loan Office known to have survived. The first volume is the 1776
mortgage register/minute book, which was transferred to the State
Archives by the Gloucester County Historical Society in 1995. This
volume is the loan-office commissioners' second copy, which was
required to be kept according to the 1774 law. In addition to containing
descriptions of the mortgaged lands, the volume also includes the
original signatures of the mortgagors. The loan-office legislation
directed the commissioners to remove the mortgagors' signatures
and seals from the first copy after the mortgages were discharged;
however, this was not required for the second copy.
The volume apparently was in the hands of Joseph Hugg, sole commissioner
of the Gloucester County Loan Office, at his death in 1796, and
was subsequently passed down in the Hugg family for several generations.
It was donated to the Gloucester County Historical Society in 1994,
and was, in turn, transferred to the State Archives to be united
with the other surviving Gloucester County Loan Office records.
Considering that the book was reused as a geometry/surveying workbook
by Hugg family members, the mortgages it contains have survived
surprisingly well.
The mortgages granted out of the 1776 loan were all dated the 25th
of March that year, with the exception of five granted in 1777 (Nos.
103-107) and one granted in 1779 (No. 108). While the index and
five of the mortgage pages were torn out (probably for scrap paper),
the loan-office commissioner's minutes remain intact in the back
of the volume (to 2 May 1786) and, along with the 1786 records,
help to identify some of the missing 1776 mortgages.
The second and third volumes, relating to the 1786 loan, were transferred
to the former Public Record Office by the Gloucester County Clerk
in 1924. The 1786 mortgage register is also the commissioners' second
copy, and therefore retains the original signatures of the mortgagors.
All of the mortgages recorded in this volume are dated 5 December
1786, even though the loan-office commissioners did not meet until
the 21st of December. The account ledger, which was required by
law to be kept separately, includes a payment record for each mortgagor
plus accounts of the commissioners with the state treasurer. The
back of the ledger contains the minutes of the Gloucester County
Loan Office from 21 December 1786 to 10 January 1787.
Detailed abstracts of the mortgage information contained in these
three volumes are provided following the Contents
list below.
|